About Me

Name: Old Retired Fart
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Does Anyone Look at the Numbers?

I was just playing around a little with President's Obama's cap and trade numbers.  Has anyone looked at these?  And if they have, why hasn't anyone asked the direct questions?

The President says he will raise $646 billion over 10 years.  Now someone is going to have to pay that, and he swears it will not be the the bottom 95% of taxpayers.  Just a little simple math.  There are about 300 million folks in this county.  5% of 300 million is 6 million.  (I know not everyone pays taxes, but I'm giving Obama as much leeway as I can). That adds up to $107,667 per person.  Now given that the average family is 2.6ish...that comes to just about $300,000 per family just to pay for cap and trade. 

Why has no one thrown that number in the President's face and asked if he seriously expects these folks to sit still for that?  Of course it could just be the truth that this will get equally spread over all citizens, in which case, each family's share will only be about $6,000....Someone ask these questions please!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Simple Solution to the Financial Crisis

It is funny to me that no one seems to be asking the simple and obvious questions about the "stimulus" package Congress is about to debate.  We should be asking ourselves, how is this going to help the economic situation? (It won't ,Kensian pump-priming has never worked, and there is no reason to believe it will work this time) and How are we going to pay for this?  The budget crisis is the real crisis we will be facing soon. Fortunately, there is a simple method for solving the crisis that answers both of these questions.

Step 1).  Across the board PERMANENT tax cuts.  This answers the first question, how is this going to help the economy.  There is research out today that shows that the rate of people losing/leaving their jobs is actually lower than it was a year ago.  The reason for the rise in unemployment is the lack of new jobs.  Right now there is a terrible sense of uncertainty, particularly as regards tax rates.  Permanently lowering the rates would reduce the uncertainty and at the same time create an incentive for people to create new jobs.  New jobs would reduce the unemployment rate.  Amazing how simple that is.

Step 2)  How do we pay for that?  There are two parts to this, first there is the increase tax revenue that seems to always follow a tax cut, but we will set that aside in favor of a much simpler tool...zero based budgeting.

Zero base budgeting is really simple.  The government would start by budgeting all of it's non-discretionary requirements, medicare, social security, and national defense.  After that, every other expenditure is listed in rank order...from most important to least.  The government then simply counts down to where their expected revenue runs out and draws a line.  Nothing below the line gets funded.  The result, a balanced budget in year one.

This is how families traditionally budget.  There is no reason the Federal Government can't do the same. 

Write your senators/representatives, let them know you are watching.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals, Unions, and Auto Bailouts

I was reading this morning that we are near a bail out agreement for the "Big 3".  There is a lot of speculation as to what the strings will be, but apparently there will be some sort of government oversight.  I read in a couple of articles that people really want the senior executive's pay capped, and that they companies won't be able to pay dividends while still owing on the loans. No where have I seen any serious talk about the unions giving back anything.  Now according to news reports, the average union auto-worker makes $78 an hour an the average non-union auto-worker makes $48 and hour (for those of you keeping score that means the average non-union auto-worker has to scrape by on more than $99K a year compared to the $162K for the union worker).  Now if GM just reduced their wages to average non-union wages they would save $7,980,000 EVERY HOUR! (266,000 workers times $30 an hour).  That is $16,598,400,000 a year.  There is your $16 billion bail-out right there.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »